bundles / scipy latest / scipy / signal / _signaltools / choose_conv_method
function
scipy.signal._signaltools:choose_conv_method
Signature
def choose_conv_method ( in1 , in2 , mode = full , measure = False ) Summary
Find the fastest convolution/correlation method.
Extended Summary
This primarily exists to be called during the method='auto' option in convolve and correlate. It can also be used to determine the value of method for many different convolutions of the same dtype/shape. In addition, it supports timing the convolution to adapt the value of method to a particular set of inputs and/or hardware.
Parameters
in1: array_likeThe first argument passed into the convolution function.
in2: array_likeThe second argument passed into the convolution function.
mode: str {'full', 'valid', 'same'}, optionalA string indicating the size of the output:
fullThe output is the full discrete linear convolution of the inputs. (Default)
validThe output consists only of those elements that do not rely on the zero-padding.
sameThe output is the same size as
in1, centered with respect to the 'full' output.
measure: bool, optionalIf True, run and time the convolution of
in1andin2with both methods and return the fastest. If False (default), predict the fastest method using precomputed values.
Returns
method: strA string indicating which convolution method is fastest, either 'direct' or 'fft'
times: dict, optionalA dictionary containing the times (in seconds) needed for each method. This value is only returned if
measure=True.
Notes
Generally, this method is 99% accurate for 2D signals and 85% accurate for 1D signals for randomly chosen input sizes. For precision, use measure=True to find the fastest method by timing the convolution. This can be used to avoid the minimal overhead of finding the fastest method later, or to adapt the value of method to a particular set of inputs.
Experiments were run on an Amazon EC2 r5a.2xlarge machine to test this function. These experiments measured the ratio between the time required when using method='auto' and the time required for the fastest method (i.e., ratio = time_auto / min(time_fft, time_direct)). In these experiments, we found:
There is a 95% chance of this ratio being less than 1.5 for 1D signals and a 99% chance of being less than 2.5 for 2D signals.
The ratio was always less than 2.5/5 for 1D/2D signals respectively.
This function is most inaccurate for 1D convolutions that take between 1 and 10 milliseconds with
method='direct'. A good proxy for this (at least in our experiments) is1e6 <= in1.size * in2.size <= 1e7.
The 2D results almost certainly generalize to 3D/4D/etc because the implementation is the same (the 1D implementation is different).
All the numbers above are specific to the EC2 machine. However, we did find that this function generalizes fairly decently across hardware. The speed tests were of similar quality (and even slightly better) than the same tests performed on the machine to tune this function's numbers (a mid-2014 15-inch MacBook Pro with 16GB RAM and a 2.5GHz Intel i7 processor).
There are cases when fftconvolve supports the inputs but this function returns direct (e.g., to protect against floating point integer precision).
Array API Standard Support
choose_conv_method has experimental support for Python Array API Standard compatible backends in addition to NumPy. Please consider testing these features by setting an environment variable SCIPY_ARRAY_API=1 and providing CuPy, PyTorch, JAX, or Dask arrays as array arguments. The following combinations of backend and device (or other capability) are supported.
==================== ==================== ==================== Library CPU GPU ==================== ==================== ==================== NumPy ✅ n/a CuPy n/a ✅ PyTorch ✅ ✅ JAX ✅ ✅ Dask ✅ n/a ==================== ==================== ====================
See
dev-arrayapifor more information.
Examples
Estimate the fastest method for a given input:import numpy as np from scipy import signal rng = np.random.default_rng() img = rng.random((32, 32)) filter = rng.random((8, 8)) method = signal.choose_conv_method(img, filter, mode='same') method✓
img2 = rng.random((32, 32)) filter2 = rng.random((8, 8)) corr2 = signal.correlate(img2, filter2, mode='same', method=method) conv2 = signal.convolve(img2, filter2, mode='same', method=method)✓
See also
- convolve
- correlate
Aliases
-
scipy.signal.choose_conv_method